Hubris or Humility: Gendered Differences in Self-Assessed Surfing Capabilities

Justin Cuevas, & Dr. Lindsey Trimble O’Connor

Surfing has been a male dominated sport since its inception in the United States in the early 1900’s and has continued that trend even as women’s participation in sports has become more equitable. The gendered differences in sports are expanded in surfing by a lack of representation for women and lack of access to resources. There has not been a study that examines self-perceived ability which is important because a higher self-rated ability shows confidence and a feeling of being accepted. My research question was how does gender and years spent surfing impact a surfer’s self-rated ability? I hypothesized that women will have a lower self-rated ability than men regardless of time spent surfing. The research was conducted using secondary data analysis from data collected using the online Surfing Access Disruption Survey conducted from April 2020 through April 2021. The sample size included a total of 921 men and women that surf with experience ranging from beginners less than a year to 66 years. A means comparison test was conducted between women and men that have surfed from 0-2 years, 3-5 years, 6-10 years, 10-19 years and 20+ years. I found that there were significant differences in women and men’s self-rated ability among people that surfed 0-2 years as well as 11 to 20+ years with females having a significantly lower self-rated assessment of their abilities. There was no significant difference in self-rated ability the between men and women that have been surfing from 3 to 10 years. By identifying the differences in self-rated ability among men and women this research is able to call attention to the disparities between men and women that surf bring the community closer to equality in and out of the water.

Poster Presentation

Session 1

9:15am – 10:30am
Grand Salon

Sociology

The Relationship Between Division and Equity of Household Chores on Sexual Satisfaction

Marissa Barreto, & Dr. Lindsey Trimble O’Connor

In marriage, there are various stressors that can cause strain on couples’ relationships, but better communication can help lessen those negative impacts. Previous research reported sexual frequency increased only among egalitarian couples when comparing data from the 2006 Marital and Relationship Survey (MARS) and Wave 2 of the National Survey of Families and Households (NSFH2) collected in 1992-1994. Current research has not investigated the ways married individuals’ distribution and equity of household chores affect sexual satisfaction in a marriage. I hypothesized women will feel less sexual satisfaction towards their partner the less household chores they perform and if they feel they do more household chores than their partner. Utilizing secondary data analysis, I used the 2019 American Trends Panel Wave 50 with 6,459 participants to analyze the relationship between satisfaction towards distribution of household chores and division of household chores or responsibilities and satisfaction with the sex lives of American married couples of all ages. I compared the differences between males and females; eventually finding that there was a significant positive correlation between sex life satisfaction and satisfaction towards the division of household chores for men and women. In addition, there was significant correlation between sex life satisfaction and equality over who does more household chores and responsibilities; however, data showed that whether it be men or women, whoever took on more work felt less satisfaction in their sex life. Implications suggest that in the case of satisfaction towards the division of household chores between spouses, and equity of household chores, satisfaction in one’s sex life will decrease when one person does more housework; meaning that for both men and women, the equal distribution of household chores will lead to a more satisfying sex life.

Poster Presentation

Session 1

9:15am – 10:30am
Grand Salon

Sociology

Love is Not a Crime But the Gay Male Wage Gap Is: The Wage Gap Between Gay Men and Straight Men and Whether it Varies by Educational Attainment

Abel Arias Campos, & Dr. Lindsey Trimble O’Connor

Throughout the United States the LGBTQ+ community has faced discrimination in numerous ways. There is a workplace that the LGBTQ+ community face due to their sexual orientation. There is not much research on the income differences between both gay and straight males due to their educational attainment. My research question is: Does sexual orientation have an effect on wages and does education moderate the relationship between sexual orientation and wages? My three hypotheses are: H1: I hypothesize that gay men with high levels of education will earn significantly less than straight men with high levels of education. H2: I hypothesize that gay men with moderate levels of education (Bachelor’s and jv degree) will earn a little less than straight men with moderate education. H3: I hypothesize that gay men with low levels of education will earn the same as straight men with low levels of education. I conducted a secondary analysis and analyzed the 2008-2018 The General Social Survey which provided a total of 4756 American men: 4641 straight males and 115 gay males. I estimated a Chi-Squared Test for men who have a high school or less education, Bachelor’s or jv degree (a degree lower than a Bachelor’s), and graduate degree.

The findings within these three Chi-Squares showed a significance of <.001 which is significant evidence that straight men earn more than gay men within each educational level. I estimated a Chi-Square between gay/straight males and income in which results signified <.001, showing significant evidence that straight males earn more than gay males in different jobs through educational attainment. The findings conclude that there is workplace discrimination affecting the income of gay males. This proves the decrease in income that they receive compared to straight males. My study increases knowledge towards the discrimination that the LGBTQ+ community faces.

Poster Presentation

Session 1

9:15am – 10:30am
Grand Salon

Sociology

Mexicans Intersectional Identities & Their Ascriptive Inequalities in Italy

Jasmine Ramirez, & Dr. José Luis Collazo

A new wave of Latin American migration is hitting Southern European countries as it is establishing new migrant group demographics as well as new settlement patterns. Unfortunately, there are institutional barriers that restrict migrants to fully incorporate themselves within these new destinations. Reunification family processes are restricted by ascriptive inequalities and the labor market is segmented leaving the stratification of communities and families as well as the inability for social mobility. Immigration literature remains to be male and class centered, ultimately leaving women ignored and only mentioned through the means of the family unit. I aimed to understand how intersectionality affects Mexican immigrants and their experiences in Italy. The framework used to conduct the analysis is Intersectional Theory which explains how overlapping social identities are connected to systems of oppression. The following questions were addressed: 1) What are the gendered inequalities Mexican immigrants face within their Italian experiences? and 2) What ideas are associated with Italian Nationalism? Transcription and coding of semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 Mexican immigrants residing in Italy. To achieve triangulation the codes were discussed with the Principle Investigator. The findings revealed two themes: feminine troubles and nationalism linked to anti-immigrant ideologies. Feminine troubles were encompassed by sexism within different realms of society, such as in academics. In addition to seeking justice against sexism, it can result in severe punishments and or threats to their lives. Italian Nationalism is associated with anti-immigrant ideas as the sense of Italian superiority socially excludes immigrants.

Oral Presentation

10:45am – 12:15pm
Del Norte 1555

Sociology

Justice, Autonomy, and Domestic Violence: A Theoretical Analysis of the FJC and the Criminal Justice System

Gerardo Santos, & Dr. Daniel Sandoval

The recovery and justice model of the Family Justice Center has made an important impact on the lives of victims experiencing family violence. Counties across the US have invested into these centers providing it will help increase a clearer support pathway for victims. Paradoxically, these services are bound within the penal justice system. In Oxnard, California there is development for an FJC along with a second floor serving as a police hub. Scholars have addressed the lack of community trust towards the police, especially those of low-income, working class, communities of color due to historical state violence and systemic racism; using a LatCrit theoretical perspective, along with concepts of Autonomy through the lens of Zapatismo, this paper aims to discuss the FJC model, its dependency on the state and its relevance to victims of domestic violence. Through key in-depth interviews with the Chief Deputy District Attorney of Ventura County, and the Carmen Ramirez Family Justice Center project manager, questions regarding community outreach, alternatives to policing, and critical framework application convey the foci of inquiry; the aim of this study is to understand whether dependency to the criminal justice system, and ultimately the state, aid or impede victim recovery. By taking a deeper look into these elements, this study aspires to reveal the underpinnings of the FJC and their efforts to cultivate healing within Latina victims of domestic violence in order to foster autonomy.

Oral Presentation

10:45am – 12:15pm
Del Norte 1530

Sociology

Exploring Correlations: Gang Affiliation and Restraining Order Success Rates in Domestic Violence Cases

Danielle Ortega, Dr. Daniel Sandoval, & Dr. Angel Villasenor

This research investigates the impact of gang affiliation on the success of obtaining restraining orders for victims of domestic violence, while considering sociological, psychological, and legal dimensions. It explores societal structures, power dynamics, and challenges faced particularly by immigrant and Latina women, as well as the influence of gang-related violence on domestic abuse. Emphasizing the need for survivor education and judicial awareness, this study seeks to enhance the efficacy of legal interventions such as protection orders. The central research question examines whether perpetrators’ gang affiliations correlate with increased success rates in securing restraining orders for domestic violence victims. Data will be collected from the Ventura County Family Justice Center and analyzed using chi-square analysis. It is anticipated that victims of domestic violence whose perpetrators are gang-affiliated will demonstrate higher rates of success in obtaining restraining orders.

Previous literature has not explored the correlation between gang affiliation and the success rates of restraining orders in domestic violence (DV) cases. Feminist theory suggests that men employ various tactics, including physical violence, to assert dominance over women and families. Studies indicate higher rates of intimate partner violence (IPV) in households characterized by traditional gender roles and disparities in patriarchal values. Power theorists contend that violence stems from cultural and familial dynamics, with economic hardships and power imbalances increasing the risk. Consistent findings demonstrate heightened IPV rates in families experiencing conflict, stress, and lower socioeconomic status.

Oral Presentation

10:45am – 12:15pm
Del Norte 1530

Sociology